Round passage blocks not part of main passage block groups or in a group of their own
Not a Bug
In the fieldwork update, the new round passages appear in the block menu as individual items. They aren't grouped in any way so you either have to use an entire toolbar to host them when building with them or go into the block UI and change it out every time.
They should either be added to the passage group (they can just be added to the group if the DLC is installed) or a group of their own so they only take up 1 toolbar slot.
I have the same bug
Hello LoneGunman,
thank you for reaching our forum with this problem that you are experiencing.
Can you please share more information?
On our side, the Corridor Round (not Passage) blocks are all properly sorted under the Corridor block/category. See the image.
Can you please try to look for the Corridor block/category and see if the expected blocks (round corridors) are also present there for you?
If you are still experiencing the problem, please provide current information and also some screens as example.
Thank you in advance.
Kind Regards
Keen Software House: QA Department
Hello LoneGunman,
thank you for reaching our forum with this problem that you are experiencing.
Can you please share more information?
On our side, the Corridor Round (not Passage) blocks are all properly sorted under the Corridor block/category. See the image.
Can you please try to look for the Corridor block/category and see if the expected blocks (round corridors) are also present there for you?
If you are still experiencing the problem, please provide current information and also some screens as example.
Thank you in advance.
Kind Regards
Keen Software House: QA Department
I think he means round ones should have a separate group from other kinds, with which i agree.
I think he means round ones should have a separate group from other kinds, with which i agree.
Hm, there's 10 blocks in the Passage block group, and 14 in the Corridor block group (including the Round Corridors).
The light and heavy armor panel block groups each have 19 blocks included in them, and while that's on the higher end, I don't feel like it's too many. Therefore, I think that having 14 blocks in the Corridor block group is fine.
Also, important to note that the Corridor Round Transition block is specifically a transition made to line up with a normal Corridor block (or a hatch door or sliding door) - so Corridor Round blocks are designed to be compatible with the Signal Blocks DLC Corridor blocks, and belong in the same block group as them.
Hm, there's 10 blocks in the Passage block group, and 14 in the Corridor block group (including the Round Corridors).
The light and heavy armor panel block groups each have 19 blocks included in them, and while that's on the higher end, I don't feel like it's too many. Therefore, I think that having 14 blocks in the Corridor block group is fine.
Also, important to note that the Corridor Round Transition block is specifically a transition made to line up with a normal Corridor block (or a hatch door or sliding door) - so Corridor Round blocks are designed to be compatible with the Signal Blocks DLC Corridor blocks, and belong in the same block group as them.
Hello LoneGunman,
It’s been a while since our last comment, and we haven’t received any further response from you.
As this has been determined to be “Not a Bug,” we will go ahead and close this thread.
We hope the explanations provided have clarified the reasoning behind the block placements in this category.
However, if you still believe this arrangement is incorrect or feel it would be better sorted differently, you’re more than welcome to open a new thread in our Feedback forum; you can do so here.
Thank you for your understanding.
Kind regards,
Keen Software House: QA Department
Hello LoneGunman,
It’s been a while since our last comment, and we haven’t received any further response from you.
As this has been determined to be “Not a Bug,” we will go ahead and close this thread.
We hope the explanations provided have clarified the reasoning behind the block placements in this category.
However, if you still believe this arrangement is incorrect or feel it would be better sorted differently, you’re more than welcome to open a new thread in our Feedback forum; you can do so here.
Thank you for your understanding.
Kind regards,
Keen Software House: QA Department
Replies have been locked on this page!