[BUG] 2.3.0.2798 - Very Bad Contract Description - Lost Asteroid Base at Vallation station
Hi Keen Team!
(version 2.3.0.2798)
While testing in the world named Survival, I have noticed the first contract at Vallation station named "Lost Asteroid Base" was very badly explained.
The contract description is saying that an Engineer started building a station, lost that station and I now have to find it to complete it.
That description got me very confused because there was a completed station at the contract GPS Marker where a big Green Cube appeared telling me to search for a lost station around that GPS Marker and I got the impression I had to search for an unfinished station,
and there was no unfinished station at all after seacrhing the asteroid and other asteroids in the area.
I was able to complete that very first Contract by doing something that was not explained at all in the Contract description.
The contract description should have told me to build a brand new station inside the Big Green Cube.
That is the very Bad Contract Ttile and Description :
I have the same bug
I will add ;
I became and bit frustrated, annoyed and impatient because I had the impression I must search for a lost station once at the asteroid.
The contract description should have told me to build a brand new station inside the Big Green Cube and not to search for a Lost Asteroid Base.
And the solution was to build a brand new station inside the Big Green Cube :
I will add ;
I became and bit frustrated, annoyed and impatient because I had the impression I must search for a lost station once at the asteroid.
The contract description should have told me to build a brand new station inside the Big Green Cube and not to search for a Lost Asteroid Base.
And the solution was to build a brand new station inside the Big Green Cube :
Hello Daniel Dupuis,
It seems that this particullar Contract uses old description. I have reported this issue and attached this thread to our internal ticket (SPE2-725).
Kind Regards,
Bartosz
Keen Software House
Hello Daniel Dupuis,
It seems that this particullar Contract uses old description. I have reported this issue and attached this thread to our internal ticket (SPE2-725).
Kind Regards,
Bartosz
Keen Software House
yep agree with your coment, i already posted a feedback for it, but it is not a several bug.
yep agree with your coment, i already posted a feedback for it, but it is not a several bug.
Replies have been locked on this page!